No one knows

Published 4 months ago • 1 min read

No one knows what investors are looking for

Not even the investors themselves.

If they did, the whole process would look very different. Investors would just ask for the specific information, compare the answers, and make decisions quickly. But the investment process in deep-tech is long, iterative, and deeply human.

That’s not to say investors aren’t qualified. Seasoned investors absolutely know how to invest to achieve the outcomes they desire - but they can’t give you a formula.

Knowing how to do something is not the same as knowing what you’re doing explicitly. In philosophy, this is the difference between procedural and propositional knowledge.

An experienced music producer can tell within seconds whether a song will resonate, yet can’t isolate that decisive variable. Their knowledge is embodied; it comes from exposure to thousands of similar situations and their outcomes. It’s essentially pattern recognition.

Likewise, investors have trained their intuition through years of experience with founders, pitches, and results. They operate in an “I’ll know it when I see it” mode. That’s why the investment process evolved the way it did — it gives investors enough exposure to recognize the patterns they trust.

This is a universal human dynamic in our pursuit of value. Once something becomes an explicit value marker - say, market size - it stops being a differentiator, because every founder adjusts for it. The real opportunity signals always remain underground: patterns investors can sense but not describe.

If investors don’t know what they’re looking for, you certainly don’t either. Trying to prove you’re what they want makes no sense - and misses the real opportunity: discovering together what it might be.

Yours,

Sagi

Vision as Responsibility

There's a way to improve your startup by orders of magnitude in 10 seconds.Here’s what you do:Go to your email signature and add this to your title: CVO, Chief Visionary Officer. (You can keep your CEO title or replace it — I don’t mind.)Boom! You just made your startup more effective and drastically increased your chances of building a great product.By assuming the CVO title, you made something explicit that most startups leave vague: that there is a single source of intent in the system....

2 months ago • 1 min read

Facts vs Narrative

Most deep-tech pitches are weak due to confusion about the relationship between facts and narrative.At best, people aren’t sure what a narrative is. At worst, they think facts and narrative are opposites — that narrative is something you use when your facts are lacking. A simple scenarioImagine you meet someone and they treat you kindly. You note it as a fact. You might conclude: “This person is a good person.” Then later, that same person treats you poorly. Another fact. Now you have two...

3 months ago • 1 min read

Logic vs Belief in Deep-Tech

Deep-tech startups are building transformative technologies and care deeply about what they do - yet their ideas often get trapped behind layers of complex communication. A long vacation gave me time to dig into the root causes - and how we can do better. Here are a few short, easy reads from that reflection. The belief before logic manifesto What belief keeps deep-tech professionals from communicating effectively? Read more How clinging to logic is costing you A false belief is draining your...