A thought experiment


Here's a thought experiment.

You are a VC.
About to start yet another meeting with a startup that reached out. It’s your third today - your seventh this week.

After a couple of minutes of small talk, one of the founders connects their laptop and hits “Present.”

You lean back in your chair, ready to listen.

Now pause.

What do you hope happens next?

What could the founder say or do that will make you go:
"Yes! This is the one. Not the team from the previous meeting. Not one of the other 22 I've seen this month. This is where I should invest."

Can you think of anything?
If yes, hit reply. I'd love to hear it.


Yours,
Sagi
__________

P.S.

Every week, I help one startup with their most pressing communication challenge - free of charge.

It’s my way of meeting new people, staying sharp, and supporting teams who may not yet have the budget for deeper work.

Know a founder that needs a nudge in the right direction?
Feel free to pass this along. They can see examples or submit a request here.

Creativity in Deep-Tech

I explore this question in my short, partly visual emails, crafted through my lens as a creative director in deep-tech. Join me for insights on effective communication, marketing, design, psychology, and the philosophy of value.

Read more from Creativity in Deep-Tech

There's a way to improve your startup by orders of magnitude in 10 seconds.Here’s what you do:Go to your email signature and add this to your title: CVO, Chief Visionary Officer. (You can keep your CEO title or replace it — I don’t mind.)Boom! You just made your startup more effective and drastically increased your chances of building a great product.By assuming the CVO title, you made something explicit that most startups leave vague: that there is a single source of intent in the system....

Most deep-tech pitches are weak due to confusion about the relationship between facts and narrative.At best, people aren’t sure what a narrative is. At worst, they think facts and narrative are opposites — that narrative is something you use when your facts are lacking. A simple scenarioImagine you meet someone and they treat you kindly. You note it as a fact. You might conclude: “This person is a good person.” Then later, that same person treats you poorly. Another fact. Now you have two...

No one knows what investors are looking for Not even the investors themselves.If they did, the whole process would look very different. Investors would just ask for the specific information, compare the answers, and make decisions quickly. But the investment process in deep-tech is long, iterative, and deeply human.That’s not to say investors aren’t qualified. Seasoned investors absolutely know how to invest to achieve the outcomes they desire - but they can’t give you a formula.Knowing how...