Avoid stepping on Lego


I'm allergic to any formulaic approaches to pitching, like the common 'problem-solution-traction-team' template.

Not because it's uncreative, but because it's UNSCIENTIFIC.

These top-down frameworks are too simplistic and lack the rigor tech professionals typically display in other parts of their work.


What's top down vs bottom up thinking?

Imagine you get up at night to get a sip of cold water. You have a sufficient mental map of your apartment so you don't even turn on the lights - that's top down.

But as you take a step you spill over a box of Lego someone left in the hallway.

Your mental map fails, and now you need to feel your way forward, step by step—that’s bottom-up.

Most things, especially pitching, require both.
You just don't have sufficient information.

You’re trying to find the magic words that will make an investor pick you over a 100 other startups. But nobody, not even the investor, knows what those words are.

It's Lego bricks all over the place.

so..

Given that this is the situation, what's your plan?

Does it really make sense to follow a formula?

While the uncertainty IS uncomfortable, it’s not as painful as stepping on Lego over and over again.
Embracing it is a much better starting point to eventually reaching your goal.

Yours,
Sagi

P.S.

Sharing is caring.

If you enjoyed the read, please consider sharing it with a few friends who might find it useful. Thanks!

What makes people see value in a thing?

I explore this question in my short, partly visual emails, crafted through my lens as a pitch designer in deep-tech. Join me for insights on effective communication, marketing, design, psychology, and the philosophy of value.

Read more from What makes people see value in a thing?
A sketch of an archer aiming at a target

I start every new funding round project by asking, 'Who is our target persona?' The first answer is always vague: 'A VC.'Push a little, and I’ll get: 'A US-based VC specializing in healthcare.'"No, no," I insist. "I need a specific name and position." Once I get it, I pull their profile photo and attach it to everything we create—a constant reminder to evaluate things 'through their eyes.' Founders are usually slightly apprehensive about that. I get it. The funding round is an extreme form of...

Man with question marks

A few good questions came up this week in my practice and in response to a previous newsletter: Q: Should I pitch the same way to a top tier VC as to a 'friendly' investor? A: Trying to pitch differently to different audiences stretches you thin. 'Managing versions' in your head makes you self-conscious and less present in the moment. A good rule of thumb: aim to be the same person outside and inside any meeting room. The real question is: WHO IS that person? What do they want? What is their...

This is what you think you see This is what you actually see Our high-resolution vision is limited to a small central area of our visual field (~26 degrees), yet we don’t notice it. Why? Because our eyes are constantly moving, making whatever we focus on seem sharp. It tricks us into believing our entire field of vision is high-res, even though most of it is blurry. That bias occurs in our thinking as well Because we are able to think rationally in the areas we chose to focus lots of our...