Eyes on the prize


I start every new funding round project by asking, 'Who is our target persona?'

The first answer is always vague: 'A VC.'
Push a little, and I’ll get: 'A US-based VC specializing in healthcare.'
"No, no," I insist. "I need a specific name and position."

Once I get it, I pull their profile photo and attach it to everything we create—a constant reminder to evaluate things 'through their eyes.'

Founders are usually slightly apprehensive about that.

I get it.

The funding round is an extreme form of marketing. They feel that by focusing on a specific target persona, I am making their 'market' smaller.

But here's the thing:

The target is not the market.
A target is the thing you aim at - not the thing you achieve.

I wish you could hit exactly where you aim. In reality you'll hit around your target in all sorts of ways. But without a sharp target, you miss altogether.

The more complex the process, the smaller your target needs to be to guide your direction.

And designing a coherent, compelling future for your startup?
It doesn’t get more complex than that.

Yours,
Sagi

What makes people see value in a thing?

I explore this question in my short, partly visual emails, crafted through my lens as a pitch designer in deep-tech. Join me for insights on effective communication, marketing, design, psychology, and the philosophy of value.

Read more from What makes people see value in a thing?
A person looking at a bunch of closed boxes with logos

If pitching feels like hard work, you’re probably trying to make investors agree with your solution. That’s not the optimal way to frame your pitch. Though we often ignore that fact - investors don’t evaluate your solution in isolation; they see many startups. That means that subconsciously, they’re constantly making comparisons. Here’s the thing Being selected is not the same as being agreed with. So, you need to rethink your framing: Imagine that, for the investor, each startup meeting is...

Two ways to convey 'the problem' in a frontal presentation Option 1 Option 2 Option 2 FEELS better. (Hit 'reply' and tell me if you disagree) The question is why? What makes it a better communication? The graphics are fancier, but that's only the expression of deeper differences in approach.For example: 1. General vs Situation-Specific. Option 1 creates a reading experience, unadjusted for a frontal presentation.Option 2 gives the speaker room to talk by keeping text minimal, making it easier...

The Magic School Bus opening sequence

🎵Surfing on a soundwave,Swinging through the stars,Take a left at your intestine,Take your second right past Marson the magic school bus.... 🎵Here's one way to think about your pitch: You are Ms. FrizzleThe investors are your students.And your pitch is an exciting field trip on your magical school bus, where they will discover organisms, locations, new worlds and more as they learn about the wonders of science!If you're not a child of the 90's- this is the premise of the animated television...